King Kong (2005) has many things going for it and against it! Despite this, any film, and King Kong in particular, is much more than a summary and analysis of its strengths and weaknesses. This new version is perhaps one of the best cinema remakes of recent years! BUT.(and it is a very BIG "BUT"!) The simple fact that it is not an original story involves many limitations, at least, in my opinion! However, for a few minutes, I'll try to continue this review taking into account that the vast majority of you have never seen the 1933 original. ![]() The director of King Kong (2005), Peter Jackson (Trilogy: Lord of the Rings), says he saw the original version at age nine and that was what inspired him to become a film-maker. Although the film, at that time, tripled me in age, its special effects were the best I had ever seen, without a doubt. The ONLY Tony Kiss Castillo on FaceBook!- WARNING: Might Contain a Couple MINOR Spoilers! In 1956, when I was 8, I saw the original version (1933) of King Kong for the first time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |